Crypto exchange Digital Surge emerges as a rare survivor of FTX fallout

 

The Australian crypto exchange had $23.4 million of digital assets locked on FTX when it collapsed and FTX’s Australian subsidiary went into administration.

Australian cryptocurrency exchange Digital Surge appears to have narrowly avoided collapse, despite having millions of dollars in digital assets tied up in the now-bankrupt FTX crypto exchange.

On Jan. 24 local time, Digital Surge creditors approved a five-year bailout plan, which aims to eventually refund its 22,545 customers who had their digital assets frozen on the platform since Nov. 16, while allowing the exchange to continue operating.

The rescue plan was first floated to customers by the exchanges’ directors via email on Dec. 8, the same day the company fell into administration.

As per the “Deed of Company Arrangement,” the Australian crypto exchange will receive an $884,543 (1.25 million Australian dollars) loan from an associated business, Digico — allowing the exchange to continue trading and operating.

In a statement, administrators at KordaMentha stated that creditors would be paid over the next five years out of the exchange’s quarterly net profits.

“Customers will be repaid in cryptocurrency and fiat currency, depending on the asset composition of their individual claims,” KordaMentha said, according to a Jan. 24 report from Business News Australia.

Cointelegraph reached out to Digital Surge, which confirmed that at the second meeting of creditors on Jan. 24, a resolution was voted in favor of the rescue plan.

“We expect further communication will be provided to all customers as the administration process with KordaMentha progresses,” it added.

The Brisbane-based crypto exchange had been in operation since 2017 but became one of the casualties of FTX’s collapse in November, freezing withdrawals and deposits only days after FTX filed for bankruptcy and FTX Australia was placed into administration.

At the time, Digital Surge explained they had “some limited exposure to FTX” and would update customers in two weeks’ time — though this was later revealed to be to the tune of around $23.4 million, according to Digital Surge administrator KordaMentha.

 

The exchange has been one of the few crypto firms to form a solid plan to restart operations and avoid liquidation despite sizeable exposure to FTX.

Since November, several crypto firms, including crypto lending firms BlockFi and Genesis, have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection as a result of exposure to the fallout of FTX and market turmoil.

 

Japan’s Terra Drone gets $14M lift from Saudi investors • TechCrunch

 

Terra Drone said today it has raised $14 million in Series C funding from Wa’ed Ventures, the venture capital arm of Saudi Aramco, marking the VC firm’s first investment in Asia. 

The Japan-headquartered company, which builds drone software, hardware and uncrewed aircraft traffic management software, said the new capital brings its total raised to $97 million since its inception in 2016. It declined to comment on its post-money valuation. According to sources familiar with the situation, the startup was valued at more than $200 million in March last year when Terra Drone closed a $70 million Series B

The move comes in line with Saudi Arabia’s “Vision 2030” plan, which lays out goals to reduce the nation’s dependence on hydrocarbons and promote the use of drones in services. For example, fossil fuel companies in Saudi Arabia will utilize Terra Drone’s technology for inspection services. Drones are supposed to detect things like oil leakage. Saudi Aramco is the world’s largest oil producer and plans to increase fossil fuel production in coming years despite scientific consensus that such activities are wrecking the Earth’s climate.  

Terra Drone director Teppei Seki told TechCrunch that the startup participated in a drone program run by the nation Saudi Aramco held last year for Saudi Vision 2030. 

Saudi’s $500 billion Neom project, a 25,600 km2 city-building project on the Red Sea and Gulf of Aqaba, also will utilize Unifly’s uncrewed traffic solutions for drone services. Terra Drone is the largest shareholder in Unifly, which will work for the Neom project to commercialize drones, aiming to complete the first phase of the project in 2025. 

With the latest funding, Terra Drone plans to set up a new subsidiary, Terra Drone Arabia, wholly owned by Terra Drone, and further promote drone inspections in the region. On top of that, the company plans further international penetration in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) through the new office in Saudi Arabia.  

Terra Drone currently offers its drone and UAM solutions to 10 countries. Denmark uses Terra Drone’s uncrewed aircraft traffic management (UTM) in Danish health drones and its Health Drone Project to carry blood and medicine. Terra Drone’s UT drone for inspection is certified as a ship inspection by the International Register of Shipping, the Japan-based startup said. 

Since its last fundraising, its subsidiaries’ sales have grown by more than 50%, the company said. 

CEO of Terra Drone Toru Tokushige founded Terra Drone in 2016 to develop drone software like global air traffic management to prevent collisions by enabling safe and efficient drone and urban air mobility operations. 

“Supported by the global track record of Terra Drone, our investment represents a compelling attempt at building the UAM ecosystem in the Kingdom, one that circles a sustainable economy,” said managing director at Wa’ed Ventures Fahad Alidi. “We foresee rapid adoption for UAM technology as an emerging tech vertical in the region, and Terra Drone is well-positioned to localize their innovation across the region, starting with the Kingdom.” 

 

 

Printed Circuit Boards Market by 2018-2027 | Demand, Trends, Opportunities, Challenges, Risks Factors Analysis, Competitive Situation | Douglas Insights – Yahoo Finance

The report also enlightens the readers with the ongoing market trends and their analysis. It also contains descriptive profiles of some of the most famous companies, which include TTM Technologies, Samsung Electro-Mechanics, Nok Corp., Meiko Electronics Co. Ltd., CMK Corp., and Advanced Circuits.
Douglas – Isle of Man, Jan. 23, 2023 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Printed circuit boards, also called PCBs, are insulating sheets that serve as the building block for modern electrical devices. You can find PCB in all kinds of electronic products and devices, which includes satellite, airplane, military weapons, mouse, keyboard, laptop, computer, TV, tablet, and mobile phones.
There are multiple printed circuit boards, including rigid-flex PCB, flex PCB, rigid PCB, multi-layer PCB, double-sided PCB, and single-sided PCB, manufactured by several companies worldwide. However, most of these companies are located in China and the United States of America since they are the most advanced.
Printed circuit boards can vary in layering as they can be made with a single layer and fifty or more. They are used in a variety of products for the advantages that it offers. They are light in weight and very small in size, which is the most appropriate option for various modern devices since the technology is going towards a minimal approach these days.
They are easy to maintain in complex systems while giving manufacturers a low production cost across industries. These factors make printed circuit boards a highly cost-effective option for companies.
You cannot manufacture printed circuit boards in bulk with the same design. They are customized according to the needs of different devices and technologies.
Some main elements should be considered while designing a printed circuit board, including its installation and assembly, flexibility, configuration, and space. All of these factors are required for the environment where a printed circuit board will operate and the application for which a printed board circuit will be used.
Printed board circuits are made with the properties of poor electrical conducting and the use of a dielectric core material which will ensure the circuit transmission.
Printed circuit boards consist of Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3, categorized based on design and reliable quality. Class 1 board serves the purpose of designating a consumer electronic. Class 2 boards are used in devices requiring the high-reliability feature as a plus point, but it is unnecessary. This class of devices tries to minimize failure. The last one, the Class 3 board, is used in the most sensitive places as it represents the manufacturing standards of printed circuit boards. These are typically used in airplanes as they have a meager chance of failure.
The printed board circuit is designed using CAD tools. The manufacturers first draw a diagram to capture connectivity in one place. After that, they design a layout that depicts the actual physical representation of a circuit board. This method reduces the chances of error in printed circuit boards which is very important because they are placed in the most expensive and advanced technologies and can mess them up if manufactured incorrectly.
Browse to access an In-depth research report on Global Printed Circuit Boards Market with detailed charts and figures: https://douglasinsights.com/printed-circuit-board-market       
Douglas Insights provides an in-depth report on printed circuit boards, which includes the technologies used in assembling the entire board, the regions in which they are used, its end-user applications, the materials used in designing the board, and its multiple types.
The report includes through-hole and surface-mount technologies used in the assembly of printed circuit boards. The detailed overview of the report includes information on the layering used for interconnectivity
The report also gives an overview of the materials used in manufacturing printed circuit boards: Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyamide, CEM-3, FR-4, and others.
The report also mentions where printed circuit boards are used: retail, automotive, transportation, industrial, storage, computing, consumer electronics, energy, aviation, surveillance, defense, healthcare, and others. It also mentions the average price for printed circuit boards per the end-user application.
It offers categorical analysis according to the regions, Asia-Pacific, Europe, North America, and the rest of the world. The global market of printed circuit boards had a massive impact on the world because of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is also covered in this report.
The report also enlightens the readers with the ongoing market trends and their analysis. It also contains descriptive profiles of some of the most famous companies, which include TTM Technologies, Samsung Electro-Mechanics, Nok Corp., Meiko Electronics Co. Ltd., CMK Corp., and Advanced Circuits.
The report details contain a market assessment of the impacts COVID-19 had on the industry, along with the changes in demand and supply, government strategic decisions, and price impact.
The report identifies some of the best companies in demand because of their strategic alliance, proprietary technology, and other advantages. It also provides the readers with the latest information on opportunities in industry shift and other regional and demographic factors that will influence the market in the upcoming years from 2022 to 2027.
It estimates printed circuit boards’ current and actual market size are corresponding to region, end-user application, material, assembly technology, and types.
The report also includes a detailed assessment of political, legal, regulatory, environmental, and technological trends that influence the nature and size of the market.
It analyzes the current market trends by keeping 2021 as the base year and then estimates the revenues till 2027 through Compound Annual Growth Rates (CAGRs). The report contains around 41 data tables for an extensive and detailed overview and 37 additional tables for an in-depth analysis.
Browse to access an In-depth research report on Global Printed Circuit Boards Market with detailed charts and figures:      https://douglasinsights.com/printed-circuit-board-market    
The report offers opportunities, restraints, and drivers for the market, which the author gathered through primary and secondary research.
Douglas Insight offers an extensive report in the form of three licenses available. The first one is a Single User License which can be accessed by a single individual only, available for $5500.
The second license is Multi User License, which can be accessed and used by up to 15 users working in the same company, and is available for $6600. The third and most significant license is the Global User License, which can be used by all the employees working in the same company, and is available for $9504.
 Set a budget for a custom project and see offers from publishers all over the world: https://douglasinsights.com/projects
Countries Covered in the report are as below:
North America – United States, Canada, and Mexico
Europe – United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, Russia, Spain & Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific – China, India, Japan, South Korea, Australia & Rest of APAC
Latin America – Brazil, Argentina, Peru, Chile & Rest of Latin America
Middle East and Africa – Saudi Arabia, UAE, Israel, South Africa
Segmentation Covered into Global Printed Circuit Boards Market-
By Product
Single-Sided
Double-Sided
Multi-Layer
By Substrate
Rigid 1-2 Sided
Standard Multilayer
High Density Interconnect
IC Substrate
Others
By Component
Diodes
Capacitors
Resistors
Other
By PCB Laminate
Paper
FR-4
Composite Epoxy Material
Other
By Laminate Material
Glass Fabric
Epoxy Resin
Other
By Application
Consumer Electronic
IT & Telecom
Communication
Others
Key questions answered in this report
COVID 19 impact analysis on global Printed Circuit Boards industry.
What are the current market trends and dynamics in the Printed Circuit Boards market and valuable opportunities for emerging players?
What is driving Printed Circuit Boards market?
What are the key challenges to market growth?
Which segment accounts for the fastest CAGR during the forecast period?
Which product type segment holds a larger market share and why?
Are low and middle-income economies investing in the Printed Circuit Boards market?
Key growth pockets on the basis of regions, types, applications, and end-users
What is the market trend and dynamics in emerging markets such as Asia Pacific, Latin America, and Middle East & Africa?
Unique data points of this report
Statistics on Printed Circuit Boards and spending worldwide
Recent trends across different regions in terms of adoption of Printed Circuit Boards across industries
Notable developments going on in the industry
Attractive investment proposition for segments as well as geography
Comparative scenario for all the segments for years 2018 (actual) and 2028 (forecast)
Access complete report-      https://douglasinsights.com/printed-circuit-board-market     
Inquire (for customization, for specific regions, etc.): https://douglasinsights.com/static/contact-us
Follow Douglas Insights for More Industry Updates- @ LinkedIn Twitter
About Douglas Insights-
Douglas Insights UK limited is the first company to provide comparison of market research reports by Table of content, price, ratings and number of pages. We understand the value of time. Productivity and efficiency are possible when you take prompt and assured decisions. With our advanced algorithm, filters, and comparison engine, you can compare your preferred reports simultaneously, based on publisher rating, published date, price, and list of tables. Our data portal enables you to find and review the reports from several publishers. You can evaluate numerous reports on the same screen and select the sample for your best match.

Several laid-off Google employees took to social media to share their anger and bewilderment about losing their jobs.
Nothing will ruin a company's positive marketing flow like allegations of toxic chemicals or other health hazards. Iit happened, most recently, when an environmental health watchdog group sent a warning about elevated BPA chemicals in the sports bras produced by popular clothing makers like Nike , Gap -owned Athleta and Victoria's Secret . The latest major global brand to fall under chemical scrutiny is drinks giant Coca-Cola .
The earnings preannouncement from Siemens Energy disappointed its shareholders, but there were plenty of positive takeaways for GE shareholders.
Weeks after the company warned of wider layoffs than it previously forecast, it spelled out the specifics to state employment officials.
The flood of recently laid-off tech workers on the job market has upended the dynamic between employers and employees, leading to prolonged job searches.
It's a tech-astrophe out there. But you have options.
Generac Power Systems signed a sublease for a 481,000-square-foot former Briggs & Stratton distribution center in Germantown.
United Airlines joins a fight started last year after Southwest Airlines got hit with a $1.3 million fine for violating the law passed in 2020.
A study by the TIAA Institute found that only 37% of U.S. adults have a handle on how long they could potentially live.
Regional shipping companies across the U.S. are expanding their operations to pick up business from bigger rivals.
Hedge-fund billionaire Christopher Hohn has urged Alphabet to widen its job reduction actions to at least 20% of the company, saying 12,000 layoffs are not sufficient enough to reduce the tech giant’s cost base.
Hanesbrands, in a quiet period leading up to the release of its Q4 earnings, confirmed the layoffs but did not say how many local employees were affected. The company also has not filed notice with the state about the layoffs.
BRETT ARENDS'S ROI How do America’s working stiffs feel about their retirement savings? There’s a new survey out, and pretty much everything in it depresses me. Retirement confidence is way down. Retirement anxiety is way up.
Most of the top 10 high-growth jobs "help companies do more with less." Many seem to be middle manager positions.
What can you invest in with a Roth IRA? What constitutes a prohibited transaction? Here’s what you need to know to get the most out of your Roth IRA.
Encourages 'exclusivity' rather than looking at a global solution for the shift away from fossil fuels, he says
Despite the bearish sentiment associated with the Zacks Oil and Gas – Exploration and Production – Canadian industry, we advice focusing on fundamentally sound companies like CNQ, OVV and BTEGF.
The crypto-lending sector turned out to be poorly risk-managed, subjecting users to heavy losses after epic boom.
If you plan to retire within the next 10 years, you still have time to boost your 401(k) contributions and make other moves to increase your savings.
What's in your digital wallet? Every major US bank is hoping it'll be one of them. Wells Fargo, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and four other…

Vitalik Buterin divulges the ‘largest remaining challenge’ in Ethereum

Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has shared a possible solution to what he describes as the “largest remaining challenge” on Ethereum — privacy.

In a blog post on Jan. 20, Buterin acknowledged the need to come up with a privacy solution because by default, all information that goes onto a “public blockchain” is public too.

He then arrived at the concept of “stealth addresses” — which he said can potentially anonymize peer-to-peer transactions, nonfungible token (NFT) transfers, and Ethereum Name Service (ENS) registrations, protecting users. 

In the blog post, Buterin explained how on-chain transactions can be carried out between two parties with anonymity. 

Firstly, a user looking to receive assets will generate and keep a “spending key” that is then used to generate a stealth meta-address.

This address — which can be registered on ENS — is then passed onto the sender who can perform a cryptographic computation on the meta-address to generate a stealth address, which belongs to the receiver. 

The sender can then transfer assets to the receiver’s stealth address in addition to publishing a temporary key to confirm that the stealth address belongs to the receiver. 

The effect of this is that a new stealth address is generated for each new transaction.

Buterin noted that a “Diffie-Hellman key exchange” in addition to a “key blinding mechanism” would need to be implemented to ensure that the link between the stealth address and the user’s meta-address can’ be seen publicly.

The Ethereum co-founder added that ZK-SNARKs — a cryptographic-proof technology with built-in privacy features — could transfer funds to pay transaction fees.

However Buterin emphasized that this may lead to problems of its own — at least for the short term — stating “this costs a lot of gas, an extra hundreds of thousands of gas just for a single transfer.”

Related: Crypto privacy is in greater jeopardy than ever before — here’s why

Stealth addresses have long been touted as a solution to address on-chain privacy issues, which have been worked on since as early as 2014. However very few solutions have been brought to market thus far.

It also isn’t the first time Buterin has discussed the concept of stealth addresses in Ethereum.

In August, he dubbed stealth addresses as a “low-tech approach” for anonymously transferring ownership of ERC-721 tokens — otherwise known as NFTs.

The Ethereum co-founder explained that the stealth address concept proposed offers privacy differently to that of the now U.S. Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC)-sanctioned Tornado Cash:

”Tornado Cash can hide transfers of mainstream fungible assets such as ETH or major ERC20s […] but it’s very weak at adding privacy to transfers of obscure ERC20s, and it cannot add privacy to NFT transfers at all.”

Buterin offered some advice to Web3 projects that are developing a solution:

“Basic stealth addresses can be implemented fairly quickly today, and could be a significant boost to practical user privacy on Ethereum.”

“They do require some work on the wallet side to support them. That said, it is my view that wallets should start moving toward a more natively multi-address model […] for other privacy-related reasons as well,” he added.

Buterin suggested that stealth addresses may introduce “longer-term usability concerns,” such as social recovery issues. However, he is confident the problems can be properly addressed in time:

“In the longer term, these problems can be solved, but the stealth address ecosystem of the long term is looking like one that would really heavily depend on zero-knowledge proofs,” he explained.

Five steps for getting compliance right

 Troy Fine, Director, Risk and Compliance, Drata

 

With the accelerating pace of regulatory change and operational resilience policies, organisations of all industries, including fintech, are struggling to remain compliant and protect data.

Getting compliance right must be a top priority as a fragmented approach will only lead to damage – such as a hefty fee, phishing scam, exposing confidential information or at worst the next data breach.

Here are the top five steps fintech companies should consider when it comes to compliance:

1. Gaining leadership buy-in

It’s one thing to have your company’s leadership acknowledge compliance as necessary to attract new (and larger) customers. Still, it’s another to provide the right resources and capital to build a comprehensive program. Consider the globally recognised ISO 27001 certification, a crucial step in implementing a strong culture of security.  The leadership focused clause of ISO 27001 emphasises the importance of information security being supported, both visibly and materially, by senior management. With new processes and controls to safeguard data, the leadership team will need to communicate the importance of these changes to the rest of the organisation. If leadership fails to fully embrace all the time, investment and changes that come with compliance, expect to see siloes within the organisation and a growing lack of trust from your customers. The ISO 27001 certification also provides the level of confidence to its clients regarding an organisation’s commitment in managing information security and compliance.

2. Investment in the right complimentary tools

Do not treat compliance as a “check the box” exercise and move on to the next task. Compliance is the baseline for a robust risk management program and just one piece of the security puzzle. For example, even though some compliance frameworks don’t require advanced endpoint detection and response solutions, they should be considered as complementary tools that strengthen the overall security posture. As your customer base diversifies, so will your need to meet various compliance frameworks, regulations, and standards.

3. Continuous monitoring

Troy Fine

Completing an annual audit isn’t enough to fully protect company data – security and compliance should be an ongoing priority that is constantly refined and evolving. If your company isn’t adapting to the latest threats and security trends, your walls of protection become weakened over time, and it won’t be long before you see cracks in the foundation.

It’s not uncommon for GDPR violations to stem from either insecure or illegal measures to properly safeguard personal data or a failure to continuously monitor security controls, and oftentimes it’s a combination of both.

Once companies achieve the requirements to adhere to data privacy regulations, their security efforts shouldn’t stop there. It requires continuous monitoring to ensure they remain compliant over time in order to lawfully protect and manage personal data.

4. Consider compliance automation technology

Compliance requires a deep understanding of existing and new evolving rules, regulations, industry standards and frameworks and showing proof of that understanding. When factoring multiple departments and employees, providing evidence to meet compliance requirements can take hundreds of hours to compile on its own. Without knowing where to start, companies often attempt to achieve compliance manually, significantly derailing their time and focus away from critical business needs. There are security and compliance tools that automate the manual burden of evidence collection, screenshots, spreadsheets, etc., and offer templates to model policies and controls instead of starting from scratch. Investing in the right automation technology feeds into an ongoing compliance program vs. a static checklist collecting dust in an overlooked security corner. Whether your company has five employees or 500, compliance is time-consuming – but the right partner can jump those hurdles with you while you cross the audit finish line.

5. Gaining visibility into vendor networks

The days when financial institutions ran every business function in-house are long gone, replaced by business services and cloud applications that integrate to varying degrees with internal systems. With greater integration, however, comes greater risk. Organisations that don’t have adequate visibility into their increasingly complex vendor networks with the rapidly changing regulatory environments are exposing themselves to high risks. Strong Vendor Risk Management (VRM) processes and practices is essential to ensure that vendors maintain consistent compliance with internal processes and evolving regulations. It is important for fintechs and financial organisations to prioritise and understand vendor risk management, its implementation, and VRM practices.

Conclusion

Security and compliance can be daunting in any scenario when you’re establishing a security footprint, addressing a customer request, or reactively implementing necessary safeguards to protect data. Without support from leadership, investment in the right tools and an ongoing process to continuously monitor their systems, companies can stand on shaky ground that may lead to failing an audit, losing customers or a data breach. Taking the time to properly understand what compliance asks of your company sets up for long-term success and instils a security-first mindset within the organisation to keep internal and external data safe.

Embracing eCommerce: what retailers will face in 2023 

by T.R Newcomb, VP, Strategy and Corporate Development, Riskified  

 

2022 has been a tumultuous year, with rising interest rates, inflation running at its highest level in decades, and the lingering effects of the pandemic all combining to produce economic uncertainty and a cost-of-living crisis in the UK.

Many consumers fear that a recession is looming, and consequently have cut back their spending. A report by VoucherCodes indicated that most regions in the UK saw a decline in spending in the run-up to Christmas – traditionally a vitally important shopping period for retailers – with spending down 1.3% compared to the year before.

In this context of higher costs and lower consumer demand, 2023 could prove to be a make-or-break moment for retailers operating on slim margins. Many will rely on eCommerce to produce a growing proportion of their revenues. Given this increasing importance of eCommerce channels, what behaviours and changes should online retailers anticipate in the coming months? Here are three trends that we at Riskified predict will impact the industry:

Policy abuse set to skyrocket 

Policy abuse, which happens when a consumer exploits (intentionally or otherwise) a retailer’s terms and conditions, has gained significant traction over the past few years. Not only is it getting more common, but it’s also costing online retailers millions of pounds, and will continue to be a top priority for them to address in 2023.

T.R Newcomb

Policy abuse takes many forms. For example, it occurs when customers misuse promotion codes, falsely report a mis-delivered item, or return used or worn items. These behaviours impact all areas of a retailer’s business – from legal to customer service to shipping and logistics.

As we enter 2023, the ongoing economic downturn is forcing consumers to think critically about every pound they spend and every pound they save. We can anticipate, therefore, that consumers are likely to continue finding and abusing loopholes in retailers’ policies to try and save money.

Fighting policy abuse is extremely complex without the right tools in place, and online retailers must balance the customer experience with managing financial losses. If a customer makes dozens of purchases but is suspected of committing policy abuse on only one item, some retailers may choose to overlook the instance rather than risk losing a loyal customer. Sophisticated fraud prevention solutions can analyse data from various customer interaction channels to uncover patterns of behaviour and help retailers identify when policies are being abused and which customers are abusing them.

If retailers don’t pay attention to these consumers’ behaviours and adapt accordingly to manage and prevent policy abuse, bottom lines can be severely impacted throughout 2023.

Brands must double down on personalising the customer experience

In a competitive eCommerce environment, you’ll be hard pressed to find a retailer that isn’t currently hard at work looking for ways to increase and maintain customer loyalty. Securing ongoing loyalty will be of paramount importance in 2023, especially as economic uncertainty continues to sap consumer demand. Consumers who receive an excellent shopping experience are far more likely to keep returning – which is where personalisation comes in.

Much is already written about the value of personalising the early stages of the customer experience – from retargeting adverts to providing customised content and more relevant product recommendations. But there are other areas of the eCommerce shopping experience, like checkout and post-purchase, that also afford compelling opportunities to retailers willing to explore this space.

Personalisation allows retailers to customise every touchpoint throughout the shopping experience, maximising loyalty and retention. This holistic, end-to-end approach must also encompass the customer experience post-purchase, including ongoing customer support and a seamless process for requesting returns and refunds. Retailers can take this a step further and tailor their return policy decisions to block abusers while providing greater leniency to loyal customers as a reward.

The key to winning in 2023 will be embracing creativity and moving away from a one-size-fits all approach at every stage of the purchase experience.

Retailers must navigate PSD2 issues

While the EU’s second Payment Services Directive (otherwise known as PSD2) was launched in late 2015, the deadline for full compliance only finally came into effect in March 2022 in the UK, following several delays. The regulation has meant that much has changed in the online payment space, especially around the strong authentication requirements of transactions.

Over the last year, card issuers have introduced the new 3D Secure (3DS) 2 protocol which aims to manage both risk and the customer experience during a PSD2-compliant authentication process, with the ultimate goal of improving successful approval rates.

One major change to expect in 2023 will be the advent of new authentication technologies, including delegated authentication for merchants. Retailers who qualify will be able to perform authentication through their own platforms, which has the potential to boost revenues through improved customer experience, a lower rate of cart abandonment, and an increase in transaction approval rates.

Unfortunately, it is likely that only enterprises or larger retailers will have the capacity to offer delegated authentication. Smaller and mid-sized merchants will continue to struggle with regular solutions; for them, leveraging exemptions through the usage of Transaction Risk Analysis (TRA) will still be the most effective solution. However, retailers relying on TRA will be hampered by the fact that there remains large unevenness across the EU market regarding the usage and acceptance of exemptions. Issuers in the UK are leading the way here, but issuers in southern Europe are much less aligned in accepting exemptions.

Retailers in 2023 may still be busy adapting to the rules of PSD2, resolving any 3DS-related technical issues and looking for the best ways to leverage exemptions, but they must also pay attention to the conversation around the next evolution of these regulations: PSD3.

In May 2022, the EU Commission opened consultations into revisions for PSD2, and there is a big opportunity for industry representatives to shape this debate. There is a possibility for the whole scope of the regulation to be widened to include emerging trends and new payment methods, such as embedded finance and cryptocurrencies, as well as protect against new types of fraud.

While PSD3 is likely to be years away, it is a reminder that retailers need to look through short-term economic uncertainty and focus on their long-term growth and survival. Adapting to the changing landscape is a never-ending process and is key for retailers to be agile and maintain growth.

Russia to begin work on CBDC settlement system in Q1 as sanctions endure: Report

 

Russia’s central bank is reportedly set to begin developing a cross-border settlement system using its Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) amid ongoing sanctions in response to its invasion of Ukraine.

The plans to move forward with Russia’s digital ruble are expected to come in the first quarter of 2023 and will see Russia’s central bank study two possible cross-border settlement models, according to a Jan. 9 report from local media outlet Kommersant.

The first proposed model sees various countries entering into separate bilateral agreements with Russia to integrate their CBDC systems.

Each agreement would be made to ensure the conversion and transfer of assets between the countries are in accordance with the rules of the agreements.

The second, more complicated model proposes a single hub-like platform for Russia to interact with other countries, sharing common protocols and standards to facilitate payments between the connected countries.

Roman Prokhorov, the head of the board of the Financial Innovations Association (AFI) opined that the first model was more simple to implement but less promising for bilateral interactions between countries.

The other option was more “advanced” and he considered an initial two-way system may be implemented with China as the most likely partner for its “technological and political readiness.”

Earlier reports in Sep. 2022 claimed Russia was planning to use its digital ruble for settlements with China by sometime in 2023.

Still, others believe Russia’s CBDC play won’t be hamstrung by technology, but rather by politics.

Vice President of the Association of Banks of Russia, Alexey Voylukov, said introducing a digital ruble won’t change or improve Russia’s global political situation and trials for the CBDC platform can only be undertaken with Russian government-friendly countries who are technologically ready.

Related: Crypto regulation world: How laws for digital assets changed in 2022

Previously, the Bank of Russia said it was looking to roll out its digital ruble by 2024, with all banks and credit institutions connected to the CBDC’s platform.

Russia has faced mounting financial and trade sanctions since its escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian war when it launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in late-February 2022.

It’s since tried to enact policies, or pondered ways to skirt the sanctions such as the central bank considering the use of cryptocurrencies in the country “only to support foreign trade.”

The Bank of Russia and the Ministry of Finance came to an agreement in Sep. 2022 on a rule allowing Russians to send cross-border payments using crypto.

Supreme Court clears way for WhatsApp case against NSO Group, opening spyware firm to more lawsuits

 

The Supreme Court on Monday denied a petition from NSO Group, the Israeli spyware maker, to dismiss a lawsuit alleging the firm exploited the WhatsApp platform in 2019 to spy on 1,400 users.

The decision upholds a previous California federal court ruling that rejected NSO Group’s arguments that it qualified for foreign sovereign immunity because it had been acting on behalf of a foreign government to investigate terrorist activity at the time it deployed the software.

NSO Group filed its petition with the Supreme Court in April after a federal judge in California rejected an appeal in the case brought by Meta, WhatsApp’s parent company.

“Meta has repeatedly impeded law enforcement’s ability to lawfully investigate criminals use of WhatsApp to commit serious crimes and acts of terror,” an NSO spokesperson told CyberScoop in an email. “We are confident that the court will determine that the use of Pegasus by its customers was legal.”

The Supreme Court previously called on the Biden administration to weigh in on the case and in November the Justice Department filed an amicus brief asking the court to deny the petition. The administration in 2021 added NSO Group and fellow Israeli spyware company Candiru to its entity list of companies that pose a national security risk.

The high court’s ruling comes amid growing concern from Washington about reining in the spyware industry. President Biden is expected to sign an executive order curtailing the use of spyware by federal agencies sometime this year and members of Congress have also proposed legislative solutions.

“We’re grateful to see the Supreme Court rejected NSO’s baseless petition,” Carl Woog, a spokesperson for WhatsApp, wrote in a statement to CyberScoop. “NSO’s spyware has enabled cyberattacks targeting human rights activists, journalists, and government officials. We firmly believe that their operations violate U.S. law and they must be held to account for their unlawful operations.” 

The court’s decision could help bolster the standing of other lawsuits against the surveillance firm. The Knight Institute filed a lawsuit in U.S. federal court against NSO Group in December on behalf of members of the Salvadoran news outlet El Faro. The lawsuit alleges that the NSO Group violated U.S. hacking laws by deploying spyware against the journalists.

“We’re pleased that the Supreme Court rejected NSO Group’s petition. Today’s decision clears the path for lawsuits brought by the tech companies, as well as for suits brought by journalists and human rights advocates who have been victims of spyware attacks,” Carrie DeCell, senior staff attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, wrote in a statement. “The use of spyware to surveil and intimidate journalists poses one of the most urgent threats to press freedom and democracy today.”

Apple is also suing NSO Group in an effort to permanently ban the company from using any of its products, services or software.

Russia to begin work on CBDC settlement system in Q1 as sanctions endure: Report

Russia’s central bank is reportedly set to begin developing a cross-border settlement system using a central bank digital currency (CBDC) amid ongoing sanctions in response to its invasion of Ukraine.

The plans to move forward with Russia’s digital ruble are expected to come in the first quarter of 2023 and will see Russia’s central bank study two possible cross-border settlement models, according to a Jan. 9 report by local media outlet Kommersant.

The first proposed model sees various countries entering into separate bilateral agreements with Russia to integrate their CBDC systems.

Each agreement would be made to ensure the conversion and transfer of assets between the countries are in accordance with the rules of the agreements.

The second, more complicated model proposes a single hub-like platform for Russia to interact with other countries, sharing common protocols and standards to facilitate payments between the connected countries.

Roman Prokhorov, the head of the board of the Financial Innovations Association (AFI) opined that the first model was more simple to implement but less promising for bilateral interactions between countries.

The other option was more “advanced” and he considered an initial two-way system may be implemented, with China as the most likely partner given its “technological and political readiness.”

Reports in September claimed that Russia was planning to use its digital ruble for settlements with China by sometime in 2023.

Still, others believe Russia’s CBDC play won’t be hamstrung by technology, but rather by politics.

The vice president of the Association of Banks of Russia, Alexey Voylukov, said that introducing a digital ruble won’t change or improve Russia’s global political situation, and trials for the CBDC platform can only be undertaken with countries that are friendly withthe Russian government and technologically ready.

Related: Crypto regulation world: How laws for digital assets changed in 2022

Previously, the Bank of Russia said it was looking to roll out its digital ruble by 2024, with all banks and credit institutions connected to the CBDC’s platform.

Russia has faced mounting financial and trade sanctions since its escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian war when it launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in late February 2022.

It’s since tried and pondered ways to skirt the sanctions, such as the central bank considering the use of cryptocurrencies in the country “only to support foreign trade.”

The Bank of Russia and the Ministry of Finance came to an agreement in September on a rule allowing Russians to send cross-border payments using crypto.

Hong Kong Reaffirms Commitment to Become Regional Crypto Hub

 

Hong Kong has reaffirmed its commitment to become a regional crypto hub in following the collapse of cryptocurrency exchange FTX. “As certain crypto exchanges collapsed one after another, Hong Kong became a quality standing point for digital asset corporates,” said a top government official.

Hong Kong Aims to Become Regional Crypto Hub

Hong Kong Financial Secretary Paul Chan Mo-po reaffirmed the city’s crypto commitment at a web3 summit in Cyberport Monday.

Emphasizing that Hong Kong remains committed to becoming a regional crypto hub, the financial secretary described:

As certain crypto exchanges collapsed one after another, Hong Kong became a quality standing point for digital asset corporates.

He added that Hong Kong has a robust regulatory framework for crypto that “matches international norms and standards.”

Joseph Chan, the undersecretary for financial services and the Treasury for the government of Hong Kong, revealed at the same event that the city is preparing to issue more licenses for digital asset trading firms. Moreover, it is planning a consultation on crypto platforms to explore the potential for retail participation in the industry.

Hong Kong is pushing to become a regional crypto hub despite the collapse of crypto exchange FTX and several other crypto firms filing for bankruptcy. Last month, the city’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) issued a statement warning about the risks associated with crypto platforms offering deposits, savings, earnings, and staking services.

After years of strict regulations, Hong Kong is now pushing to make it easier for retail investors to trade crypto assets. Elizabeth Wong, the SFC’s director of licensing and head of the fintech unit, said in October last year: “We’ve had four years of experience in regulating this industry … We think that this may be actually a good time to really think carefully about whether we will continue with this professional investor-only requirement.”

In November last year, Julia Leung, another SFC executive, said the regulator is “actively looking” to set up a regulatory framework that allows retail investors to trade exchange-traded funds (ETFs) with exposure to cryptocurrency futures. In December, the city’s first crypto futures ETFs were launched.